À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Parcourir par ressort juridique

Finlande

FI020

Retour

Decree No. 527 of June 10, 1988, on the Right to Employees' Inventions (as amended up to Amendment No. 1218 of December 21, 2000)


Decree on the Right to Employees’ Inventions 10.6.1988/527

(Unofficial translation)

(Amendments up to 2000/1218 included)

Section 1

When the rights to an invention made by an employee have under the Act on the Right to Employees’ Inventions (656/1967), below the ‘Employee Inventions Act’, been transferred to the employer and the employer intends to apply for a patent for the invention, the employee shall sign an assignment concerning the transfer of rights and any other documents that may be required in the patenting process, except where the employee considers that the rights to his invention have not passed to the employer.

The signing of the documents referred to in the first paragraph shall not affect the amount of the compensation to be paid to the employee.

Section 2

The employee is entitled to the reasonable compensation referred to in section 7(1) of the Employee Inventions Act when the employer under the Act assumes rights in the invention.

If the employer and the employee agree upon transferring the rights back to the employee, such returning of rights shall be taken into account as a factor lowering the amount of the compensation.

Section 3

The value of the invention within the meaning of section 2(2) of the Employee Inventions Act refers to the economic value of the invention. In assessing the value, the total economic contribution of the invention shall be taken into account, even in the case where the invention only constitutes a part of a larger entity. Furthermore, both the value of the invention in the use of the employer or an enterprise belonging to the same group as this and the benefit derived from the transfer of rights shall be taken into account.

The value of the invention shall be determined on the basis of the measurable economic benefit, such as the savings in material, labour or energy costs produced by the invention, derived by the employer from bringing the invention into use. The benefit is calculated by subtracting from the proceeds resulting from bringing the invention into use such investment, research, experimenting, patenting and other costs arisen after the submitting of an invention report which have been necessary for rendering the invention fit for use or sale.

If, because of the nature and mode of use of the invention or for other special reason, the basis for determining the value of the invention stated in the second paragraph is not applicable, the value is to be determined through comparison to licensing agreements. The value of the invention shall in such case be determined on the basis of the licensing fee by which the employer could acquire the right to a corresponding free invention. Where rights to an invention are assigned by a licensing agreement, the net proceeds in accordance with the agreement shall be taken to be the value of the invention. Where anything else, such as know-how, is sold by the licensing agreement in addition to the rights to the invention, the value of the other elements included in the sale shall be subtracted from the price in determining the value of the invention.

If the bases for determination stated in the second and third paragraphs cannot be applied, the value of the invention shall be determined by assessing.

Section 4

The scope of the right acquired by the employer stated in section 7(2) of the Employee Inventions Act comprises the rights the employer has assumed in the invention under section 4 of the Act.

Section 5

In assessing the contribution to the making of the invention of the terms in the employment contract and other circumstances relating to the employment referred to in section 7(2) of the Employee Inventions Act, attention shall be paid to the way the task has been defined and solved, to such aspects as how the technology and facilities provided by the employer have been utilized, as well as to the position of the inventor and his terms of employment and duties in the service of the employer.

Section 6

A reasonable compensation constitutes a part of the value of the invention which shall be determined by taking into account the factors stated in sections 4 and 5 above.

Section 7

The reasonable compensation shall be determined so that it consists in part of a lump-sum and in part of a compensation in the form of royalties.

The compensation can nevertheless be determined in the form of a lump sum where the invention is of minor economic significance, the invention remains unused or other special reasons thereto exist. The compensation can be determined in the form of a lump sum also in cases where the making of the invention clearly has belonged to the duties proper of the employee and the invention is of minor value, or where no such selling price can be specified from which the royalty could be calculated.

Section 8

The royalty-form compensation referred to in section 7 above shall be determined as a percentage of the price of the products in accordance with the invention or of the price of the products manufactured by a process according to the invention. If the product constitutes only a part of the entire product to be marketed, the royalty can be determined as a percentage of the price of the product as a whole, but in fixing its size attention shall be paid to the contribution made by the invention.

Royalties shall be paid for the period of time the invention is being exploited, but not for more than 20 years.

Section 9

This Decree enters into force on 1 October 1988.