About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: IPOS Perception Survey 2006/07
Author: [Intellectual Property Office of Singapore]
Source:

APEC Intellectual Property Rights Experts’ Group
http://www.apecipeg.org/pear/presentations/JenniferChen.pdf

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Film, Music
Country/Territory: Singapore
Objective: To evaluate young Singaporeans' perceptions of intellectual property and intellectual property infringements.
Sample: 2 secondary/2 tertiary school students (peer investigation), 4 groups of 8 respondents each (focus groups); 630 Singaporeans aged 14-35 (online survey)
Methodology: Peer investigation, focus groups, online survey

Main Findings

82% of young Singaporeans agree that people deserve to have their ideas and creations protected by intellectual property (IP) rights. However, 42% still think that counterfeiting and piracy are OK (58% do not). The strongest argument against IP infringement is that “it robs the original creators their rewards and respect”; the strongest argument justifying IP infringement is “price beyond my means”.

Penalties for copyright infringement stop 61% from downloading unauthorised material from the Internet. Just 22% report being bothered or affected by IP infringements. 36% agree that buying counterfeit products affects their image, and 33% claim to think about the consequences of buying pirated goods.

Seven in ten respondents are aware of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore anti-piracy messages in the media. One quarter is familiar with the “HIP alliance” and/or “HIP friends” anti-piracy initiatives.

[Date Added: Jan 26, 2009 ]