About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Creation

Reference

Title: Innovation in Australian Business 2005
Author: [Australian Bureau of Statistics]
Source:

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/8158.02005?OpenDocument

Year: 2006

Details

Subject/Type: Innovation
Focus: Barriers, Impact, Success Factors
Country/Territory: Australia
Objective: To get an overview of innovation activity and characteristics of Australian businesses.
Sample: Random sample of approximately 6.800 businesses
Methodology: Mail survey

Main Findings

During the two years to December 2005, innovating businesses (businesses that introduced or implemented a goods, services or process innovation during the reference period) in Australia represented 33.5% of all businesses (up by 3.9% from the two-year period ended December 2003). Larger firms were more likely to be innovating than smaller ones. Businesses operating under current ownership for 9 years or more had the lowest proportion of innovators. Entirely or partially foreign-owned businesses were more innovative (with almost 60% of them undertaking innovative activities) than their wholly Australian-owned counterparts (with just 33.6% of them innovating).

The most innovative sectors were the electricity, gas and water supply industry (with 48.8% of businesses innovating during 2004 and 2005), wholesale trade (43.4%), and manufacturing (41.7%). The least innovative sectors were construction (30.8%), property and businesses services (30.3%), and retail trade (27.5%).

During 2004-5, innovating businesses derived about 4.5% of their total income from sales of goods/services introduced or implemented in the reference period. Innovation expenditure represented 3.7% of total business expenditures. Funds for expenditure on innovation-related activities came mostly from internal sources (90%), but also from borrowings (33.8%) and the federal government (2.7%)

Non-innovating respondents were far more likely to report no barriers to innovation (48.1%) than innovating businesses (26.7%). The most common barriers to innovation cited were: cost (cited as a factor hampering innovation by 58.4% of innovating businesses, and by 36.5% of non-innovating ones), market related barriers (36.7% versus 27%), and lack of skilled staff (27.2% versus 20.6%).

Drivers of innovation were profit related (reported by 94.2% of innovating businesses), market related (88.9%) or legal related (53.1%). Within the profit-related drivers, “increase revenue” (71.5%) and “improve productivity” (70.9%) dominated. “Increase responsiveness to customer needs” (65.3%) and “increase market share” (46.6%) were the most commonly reported market-related drivers. “Improve safety or working conditions” (37%) was the most important legal innovation driver.

The most commonly reported sources of ideas or information for innovative activities were “internal sources” (at 75.8%, including information from within the business or the enterprise group), followed by “market sources” (69.6%, including clients/customers, consultants, competitors and suppliers), “other sources” (43.6%, including professional conferences, meetings, fairs and exhibitions, web sites and journals), and “institutional sources” (7.7%, including universities, higher education institutions, government agencies, private non-profit research institutions and commercial laboratories).

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]