About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Corporate Image and Product Similarity - Assessing Major Demand Drivers for Counterfeits in a Multi-Country Study
Author: Elfriede Penz and Barbara Stöttinger [Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration]
Source:

Psychology & Marketing  25, no. 4: 352-381

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting
Focus: Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits)
Country/Territory: Austria, Mexico, Slovakia, Sweden, Ukraine, United States of America
Objective: To investigate key demand drivers for counterfeit goods in a multi-country study.
Sample: 1846 consumers from six different countries
Methodology: Questionnaire

Main Findings

Regardless of specific country contexts, corporate image and product characteristics (perceived product similarity between original and fake) strongly influence consumers' intention to buy counterfeits.

Consumers perceive manufacturers of original products more positively than counterfeiters. These differing corporate images of both legitimate producers (the "nice guys") and counterfeiters (the "bad guys") are mainly the product of affective opinions (i.e. based on emotional evaluations). However, specific corporate image dimensions and their relative importance vary across countries, indicating that consumers have unique ways of looking at original brand manufactures and counterfeiters.

Comparing product attributes of originals and counterfeits, respondents in all countries surveyed perceive the physical product attributes "durability" and "quality" of original products to be similar to the counterfeit. All other product attributes, such as look, functionality, image and physical appearance are said to differ between originals and fakes; however, the countries investigated differ with respect to which product characteristics need to be similar between original and fake in order to persuade consumers to buy the fake.

Thus, while the authors were able to validate their conceptual model, different country backgrounds prevent universally-valid consistent cross-cultural patterns predicting the intention to purchase counterfeits from emerging.

The study's managerial implications are the following: measures against counterfeiting at the local rather than global level; communications focusing more on emotional than on cognitive messages; finding new and innovative ways to communicate the superiority of originals, and the development of nation-specific measures for tailored marketing activities.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]